Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- benchmarks [2010/10/09 22:04] – clockwise
+++ benchmarks [2010/10/09 22:09] (current) – clockwise
@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 {{:renesheep3.jpg?150x112}}
+Forum member **24bit** sent in these notes about SheepShaver running on older machines (check below for the Basilisk II results):
+  The emulated Mac cpu is Motorola 86040 (BasiliskII) and MPC 601 (SheepShaver)
+  As host system for emaculation Windows2000pro or XP will be sufficient.
+  If those are hard to find, SuseLinux11 is a free alternative.
+  These are some scores with MiniBench (Courtesy of System7Today) of different machines,
+  MacOS was 7.1 for Basilisk and 7.6 for SheepShaver.
+  Pentium3/650: 27
+  Atom N270: 38
+  Intel E2180: 90
+  AMD X2 64 5000+: 136
@@ Line 121: / Line 138: @@
 {{:speedometer.jpg?150x112}}
-Forum member **24bit** contributed these benchmarks:
+Forum member **24bit** contributed these benchmarks from running Basilisk II on older host systems (check above for the SheepShaver results):
   The emulated Mac cpu's are : Motorola 86040 (BasiliskII) and MPC 601 (SheepShaver)
   As host system for emaculation Windows2000pro or XP will be sufficient. If those are hard to
   find, SuseLinux11 is a free alternative.
   These are some scores with MiniBench (Courtesy of System7Today) of different machines,
   MacOS was 7.1 for Basilisk and 7.6 for SheepShaver.
   MiniBench scores:
   Pentium3/650: 13
   Atom N270: 26
   Intel E2180: 60
   AMD X2 64 5000+: 70
-===== Other =====
+===== SoftMac =====
 In 2008 I compared various builds of Basilisk II and [[SoftMac]] using real world tests.  Those results are [[68k tests|here]].