This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
benchmarks [2010/10/09 22:05] clockwise |
benchmarks [2010/10/09 22:09] (current) clockwise |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
{{:renesheep3.jpg?150x112}} | {{:renesheep3.jpg?150x112}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Forum member **24bit** sent in these notes about SheepShaver running on older machines (check below for the Basilisk II results): | ||
+ | |||
+ | The emulated Mac cpu is Motorola 86040 (BasiliskII) and MPC 601 (SheepShaver) | ||
+ | As host system for emaculation Windows2000pro or XP will be sufficient. | ||
+ | If those are hard to find, SuseLinux11 is a free alternative. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | These are some scores with MiniBench (Courtesy of System7Today) of different machines, | ||
+ | MacOS was 7.1 for Basilisk and 7.6 for SheepShaver. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Pentium3/650: 27 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Atom N270: 38 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Intel E2180: 90 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | AMD X2 64 5000+: 136 | ||
Line 121: | Line 138: | ||
{{:speedometer.jpg?150x112}} | {{:speedometer.jpg?150x112}} | ||
- | Forum member **24bit** contributed these benchmarks: | + | Forum member **24bit** contributed these benchmarks from running Basilisk II on older host systems (check above for the SheepShaver results): |
The emulated Mac cpu's are : Motorola 86040 (BasiliskII) and MPC 601 (SheepShaver) | The emulated Mac cpu's are : Motorola 86040 (BasiliskII) and MPC 601 (SheepShaver) | ||
Line 140: | Line 157: | ||
AMD X2 64 5000+: 70 | AMD X2 64 5000+: 70 | ||
- | ===== Other ===== | + | ===== SoftMac ===== |
In 2008 I compared various builds of Basilisk II and [[SoftMac]] using real world tests. Those results are [[68k tests|here]]. | In 2008 I compared various builds of Basilisk II and [[SoftMac]] using real world tests. Those results are [[68k tests|here]]. |